And Thus Begins Our Feud with Patton Oswalt
posted by Jeff C. on Tuesday, January 19, 2010
I scanned my instant queue for a moment before finally settling on Big Fan, a film that was released last year starring comedian Patton Oswalt as a die-hard New York Giants fan, the type that paints his face and religiously calls in to sports talk shows.
I like Patton Oswalt. I think he's funny and intelligent and brings a likable "nerdish everyman"-type quality to his performances. And, back in September or so, when Oswalt appeared on the podcasts of both Bill Simmons and Adam Carolla to promote the film, each discussed in length how good Big Fan was and what great reviews it was receiving. Needless to say, I've been looking forward to seeing it for a while. And, just this past week, it was added to Netflix's instant play section. Which is how I found myself watching it last night.
All in all, the movie was enjoyable. Right up until the end. Patton Oswalt's character and a friend are looking at the Giants' schedule for the following season. They both enthusiastically agree that it looks like a piece of cake. "Thirteen and three," the friend says.
"What are your three losses?" Oswalt asks.
"Green Bay, New England and the Chargers," the friend says.
I stopped to rewind it and make sure I heard him correctly. Yep, he definitely said New England and the Chargers. Do you see any inaccuracy there? Like how, say, an NFC East team wouldn't ever play both the Patriots and the Chargers in the same regular season? How the Giants would either play the entire AFC East or the entire AFC West, but not some teams from each?
This baffled me. How could a movie that was obviously written by a sports fan and made for sports fans take such care to make sure all of the details are true-to-life, to the point that all of the players discussed in the film -- with one exception -- are real players, and then blow it at the last second like that? Even if the screenwriter didn't know the particulars of the NFL schedule, wasn't there one straight male involved in the production of the film who could have pointed out the flaw?
Apparently not, because upon further inspection (me rewatching the scene the following morning and pausing it on the frame where the friend holds up the clearly-visible schedule), the newspaper clipping they're looking at only lists fourteen regular season games. How hard would it have been to make a fake schedule that was, you know, similar in appearance to every NFL schedule published in every goddamn newspaper in the country?
So, essentially, Big Fan was good for eighty-three minutes. Then, like Joe Pisarcik, it fumbled the game away when it mattered most and Herman Edwards ran the ball in for a touchdown.
Well, that's the way it goes sometimes, right? Wrong. I needed to know how such a glaring oversight could occur in an otherwise good movie. Which is why I became a fan of Patton Oswalt on the Facebook this morning, and sent him the following message:
"Hey Patton... watched Big Fan last night. Liked it up until the 1 hour, 24 minute mark. Was there not one red-blooded, football-watching American male who saw that movie during the writing, shooting or editing phase and said, "You know, the Giants wouldn't play both the Chargers and the Patriots the following season. They'd only play teams from one division from the AFC..."? Also, at the risk of sounding nitpicky, the schedule that is shown on-screen only includes 14 regular season games. Perhaps these are minute details to some, but they kinda throw off the whole movie."
Patton Oswalt himself responded about an hour later. He said, "Huh, that's a very astutezzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZ."
I was a little taken aback. How could this little twerp, who prides himself on his encyclopedic knowledge of comic books, resort to inferring that I was some boring loser for wondering why his movie contained an idiotic error? In addition, I also found there to be a hint of irony in the fact that, in the movie, Oswalt follows his favorite athlete into a club solely out of admiration, and gets senselessly beaten by that athlete and his posse, who clearly want nothing to do with Oswalt's common fan. But had real-life Patton Oswalt become the bully, the one who is too sensitive and indifferent to address the factual inaccuracies of his films?
It didn't end there. A few members of his legion of dweebs went on the attack...
Cody Evjen: "ROFL"
Paul Vermeersch: "And you know, in ET, bicycles can't really fly. The aerodynamics are all wrong. Ruined the whole movie for me."
Rob Nickerson: "I'm sure they'll fix it with CGI for the upcoming Laserdisc re-release."
Then someone named Myra chimed in. I'd copy and paste her comment verbatim, but she has since blocked me for reasons that may become apparent shortly. Either way, she said something along the lines of: "Repeat after me: It's not a documentary. Then get the stick out of your ass."
I was gonna let it slide, figuring that perhaps I'm the only person on the planet who falls into both the "Fan of Patton Oswalt" camp and "Knows Shit about Football" camp...
...But Myra's comment simply rubbed me the wrong way.
My response: "Thank you, Myra. I am aware that Big Fan is not a documentary. But, let's say there was a movie about something that you were knowledgeable about: being an obnoxious cunt, for instance. And let's say that movie meticulously recreated the little details about being a cunt: the real-life names of actors in shows a cunt might watch, places that a cunt might hang out, the types of radio shows a cunt might listen to. And as you're watching it, you're thinking, 'Wow, these people have really put in a lot of effort to make sure this movie captures what it's like to be a cunt.' And then, right at the end, they include some bizarre inaccuracy that makes you wonder how they could have been so conscious of the minutiae in the rest of the movie but overlook something so simple. Wouldn't that make you curious how such an oversight could occur, Myra?"
Too harsh?
Because she responded with something just as self-righteous and pompous as her first comment, then evidently blocked me.
The lesson? As always, women really, really don't like the word "cunt."
And Patton Oswalt is a douche.
Labels: jeff c., movie reviews, patton oswalt









